Extension, Intension, Character, and Beyond

نویسنده

  • David Braun
چکیده

This article explains some of the technical terms commonly used in semantic theory. One such term is extension. The notion of an extension is a generalization of the notion of reference. Proper names refer to objects, and a proper name's extension is the object to which it refers. For instance, the extension of 'Barack Obama' is Barack Obama, and the extension of 'Los Angeles' is Los Angeles. The extension of a predicate is the set of objects to which it correctly applies. For instance, the extension of the common noun 'dog' is the set of all dogs, the extension of the verb 'run' is the set of all things that run, and the extension of the adjective 'happy' is the set of all happy things. Binary predicates correctly apply to pairs of things, and so the extension of a binary predicate is a set of ordered pairs. For example, the extension of the binary predicate 'kiss' is the set of pairs of objects such that x kisses y. The extension of a ternary predicate (such as 'give') is a set of ordered triples. Generally, the extension of an n-place predicate (where n is greater than 1) is a set of n-tuples. Complex expressions also have extensions. For instance, the extension of 'kisses Barack Obama' is the set of objects to which this phrase correctly applies, namely the set of objects that kiss Barack Obama. The extension of this complex expression is completely determined by the extensions of the simple expressions in it, for an individual z is a member of the extension of 'kiss Barack Obama' if and only if there is a pair of objects such that (i) is a member of the extension of 'kiss', (ii) y is identical with the extension of 'Barack Obama' (that is, y is identical with Barack Obama), and (iii) z is identical with x. Declarative sentences are

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Contexts, Demonstratives, and Validity

In his seminal work, “Demonstratives”, David Kaplan shows how to define validity (or logical truth) for a language containing indexical expressions such as ‘I’, ‘now’, ‘today’, ‘that’, and others. Kaplan’s great insight in that work is that the indices for context and for circumstances of evaluation (which Kaplan takes to be time and world) play conceptually distinct roles in semantics. To capt...

متن کامل

Intension and Extension of a Term

The term is defined as a linguistic sign which represents a designate, denoting together a concept and referring to a reference object. In the content part of this sign, the onomasiological basis and onomasiological mark are delimited. The designate as an element of idea, in which extension corresponds with the onomasiological basis of the content and intension corresponds with the onomasiologi...

متن کامل

On the non-split extension group $2^{6}{^{cdot}}Sp(6,2)$

In this paper we first construct the non-split extension $overline{G}= 2^{6} {^{cdot}}Sp(6,2)$ as a permutation group acting on 128 points. We then determine the conjugacy classes using the coset analysis technique, inertia factor groups and Fischer matrices, which are required for the computations of the character table of $overline{G}$ by means of Clifford-Fischer Theory. There are two inerti...

متن کامل

The Minimal Description of Formal Concept Analysis

In 1982, R.Wille (1999) proposed a new model to represent the formal concepts associated to a context (G,M, I), named formal concept analysis based on the formal context, which is a pair consisting of a set of objects (the extension) and a set of attributes (the intension) such that the intension consists of exactly those attributes that the objects in the extension have in common, and the exte...

متن کامل

On the non-split extension $2^{2n}{^{cdot}}Sp(2n,2)$

In this paper we give some general results on the non-splitextension group $overline{G}_{n} = 2^{2n}{^{cdot}}Sp(2n,2), ngeq2.$ We then focus on the group $overline{G}_{4} =2^{8}{^{cdot}}Sp(8,2).$ We construct $overline{G}_{4}$ as apermutation group acting on 512 points. The conjugacy classes aredetermined using the coset analysis technique. Then we determine theinertia factor groups and Fischer...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013